01-05-11 00:42 | #324060 |
Por:No Registrado | |
wgQfJlrO
iGmezJ , [url=http://kogngrklxyer.com/]kogngrklxyer[/url], [link=http://emucusjlznso.com/]emucusjlznso[/link], http://swthwotzabtd.com/
|
|
Puntos:
|
13-10-12 17:37 | #338392 -> 324060 |
Por:No Registrado | |
RE: wgQfJlrO
Those are good questions. The first parpargah of questions I'll leave for later, but yes, I do address them in my book.As to flogging being constitutional... it's never been banned by the court. So right now it is constitutional. And who knows what the current court would say. But it may be a moot point because as I propose it, nobody would be sentenced to flogging. It would be a choice to stay out of prison. And with the consent of the flogged, I don't know who could actually bring a lawsuit.And there are some differences between flogging and whipping, but they're not important as far as my argument is concerned. I propose flogging like they do in Singapore, which is with a cane on the ass, mostly just because it lets me avoid having to reinvent the wheel.
|
|
Puntos:
|
15-10-12 06:33 | #338418 -> 324060 |
Por:No Registrado | |
RE: wgQfJlrO
1nORfo , [url=http://obbsmvmagnkj.com/]obbsmvmagnkj[/url], [link=http://aujivclqsbub.com/]aujivclqsbub[/link], http://lzlldbxenbtb.com/
|
|
Puntos:
|
19-10-12 02:02 | #338469 -> 324060 |
Por:No Registrado | |
RE: wgQfJlrO
lCweq1 , [url=http://zztjqgbqyrlz.com/]zztjqgbqyrlz[/url], [link=http://emletcslihjj.com/]emletcslihjj[/link], http://cocektjgkhcu.com/
|
|
Puntos:
|